AZO vs SE
AutoZone vs Sea Limited — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | AZO | SE |
|---|
| AI Score |
72
|
62
|
| Price |
$3,042.94
|
$131.54
|
| P/E Ratio |
20.40×
|
49.07×
|
| ROE |
-73.2%
|
12.6%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
51.8%
|
44.3%
|
| Debt / Equity |
-4.54×
|
0.28×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
51.8
|
84.2
|
| Beta |
0.344
|
1.51
|
| Expected Upside |
+5.2%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for AZO versus SE.
AZO leads by 10 points.
AZO scores 72/100 (Buy) versus SE at 62/100 (Buy).
AZO Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- Both daily and weekly trends are bearish — strong multi-timeframe downtrend.
SE Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 40.5% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 43.3 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 40.5% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 79.5% YoY — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 43.3 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 6.1x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- RSI at 84 is in overbought territory — Technical