CARR vs CNM
Carrier Global vs Core & Main — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
CARR
Carrier Global
52
Watch
VS
| Metric | CARR | CNM |
|---|
| AI Score |
52
|
62
|
| Price |
$60.37
|
$44.85
|
| P/E Ratio |
41.54×
|
18.86×
|
| ROE |
10.8%
|
22.1%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
24.3%
|
27.1%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.94×
|
1.20×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.6%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
26.7
|
42.2
|
| Beta |
1.309
|
0.917
|
| Expected Upside |
+0.8%
|
+20.0%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CARR versus CNM.
CNM leads by 10 points.
CNM scores 62/100 (Buy) versus CARR at 52/100 (Watch).
CARR Committee View
50% agreement
4 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case. Growth Analyst remains cautious — growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- RSI at 27 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup) — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
CNM Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is news sentiment is positive (+0.44 across 9 articles, 14d). The main limiting factor is price-to-book of 5.3x prices in significant intangible value. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 22.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 5.3x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical