CHRD vs TS
Chord Energy vs Tenaris S.A. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | CHRD | TS |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
64
|
| Price |
$137.60
|
$53.12
|
| P/E Ratio |
9.31×
|
14.31×
|
| ROE |
0.6%
|
11.6%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
27.4%
|
33.7%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.18×
|
0.03×
|
| Dividend Yield |
3.7%
|
3.3%
|
| RSI (14) |
61.5
|
35.1
|
| Beta |
0.381
|
0.476
|
| Expected Upside |
+4.4%
|
+20.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CHRD versus TS.
The committee scores are tied.
CHRD and TS both score 64/100.
CHRD Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 8.9 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is bollinger bandwidth of 15.9% signals elevated volatility. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 8.9 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 0.7x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 3.7% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 15.9% signals elevated volatility — Risk
TS Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.03) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 14.6 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.2x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 4.4% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical