CLH vs NOC
Clean Harbors vs Northrop Grumman — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
NOC
Northrop Grumman
60
Buy
| Metric | CLH | NOC |
| AI Score |
63
|
60
|
| Price |
$313.65
|
$550.21
|
| P/E Ratio |
37.30×
|
17.20×
|
| ROE |
14.2%
|
25.1%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
26.6%
|
20.1%
|
| Debt / Equity |
1.04×
|
0.91×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
1.7%
|
| RSI (14) |
36.2
|
33.3
|
| Beta |
0.856
|
-0.108
|
| Expected Upside |
+1.6%
|
+0.4%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CLH versus NOC.
CLH leads by 3 points.
CLH scores 63/100 (Buy) versus NOC at 60/100 (Buy).
CLH Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is news sentiment is positive (+0.40 across 20 articles, 14d). The main limiting factor is p/e of 38.5 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 15.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 38.5 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 4.6x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
NOC Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
Positive signals support the current rating — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The committee sees sufficient evidence to maintain the constructive view.
Bull Case
- ROE of 26.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 4.9x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical