CLS vs FISV
Celestica Inc. vs Fiserv — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
CLS
Celestica Inc.
61
Buy
VS
| Metric | CLS | FISV |
|---|
| AI Score |
61
|
69
|
| Price |
$310.37
|
$52.70
|
| P/E Ratio |
31.93×
|
10.10×
|
| ROE |
38.3%
|
13.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
11.6%
|
47.2%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.33×
|
1.04×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
39.8
|
43.1
|
| Beta |
1.516
|
0.819
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+23.5%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CLS versus FISV.
FISV leads by 8 points.
FISV scores 69/100 (Buy) versus CLS at 61/100 (Buy).
CLS Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 36.7% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 24.6% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 47.3% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 36.7% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 131.2% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 38.2 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 15.3x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
FISV Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical