Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
CLS · NYSE · STOCK

Celestica (CLS) Stock Analysis

Technology Updated October 10, 2026
$362.06
52W $238.23 – $474.03
60/100
$41.64B
37.3
1.46
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
60/100
Conviction: Contested · 67% agreement · 6 analysts
+0.3%
-10.2%
0.03:1
Contested
⚠
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.

Is CLS Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates Celestica Inc. (CLS) Buy with a composite score of 60/100 , based on 6 analysts with 67% agreement. Last updated October 10, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +14.66 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -5.34 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 47.3% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Portfolio Manager remains cautious — sector concentration is already high (hhi 2796.97). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • ROE of 50.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
  • Revenue growing 47.3% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
  • EPS growing 109.1% YoY — Growth
  • 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
  • P/E of 40.2 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
  • Price-to-book of 14.9x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
  • Bollinger bandwidth of 25.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 10, 2026
Overall Committee Score
60/100
Agreement
67%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 37%
of 287 Technology peers
Value Analyst neutral
49 / 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 50.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− P/E of 40.2 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst bullish
84 / 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 47.3% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
Technical Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst bearish
35 / 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− Bollinger bandwidth of 25.0% signals elevated volatility
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst bullish
68 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 40 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager bearish
30 / 100 · Moderate confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2796.97)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 61.6 to 60.3.

Analyst-level changes:
  • News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Technical Analyst: score 69->61 (-8); +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-10 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
48.7
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.842
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$325.04
Resistance
$363.21
Bollinger %B
0.56
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$367.71 Below
EMA 21
$357.32 Above
EMA 50
$345.30 Above
EMA 200
$324.06 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
37
Growth
79
Profitability
59
Financial Health
68
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 37.3×
P/B Ratio 16.80×
PEG Ratio 0.32
Dividend Yield 0.00%
52W High $474.03
52W Low $238.23
Quality & Growth
ROE 3763.1%
ROA 1156.2%
Gross Margin 1195.2%
Operating Margin 885.6%
Revenue Growth YoY —
Debt / Equity 0.33
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 37.3 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 16.8x; PEG ratio of 0.3 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 37.6%; Return on assets of 11.6%; Net margin of 7.2%; Gross margin of 12.0%; Current ratio of 1.23 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.33; Free cash flow per share is positive (4.51); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 9.5%; 4 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth accelerating (+14.3% -> +17.6% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full CLS Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime