CNX vs HP
CNX Resources vs Helmerich & Payne, Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
HP
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
58
Watch
| Metric | CNX | HP |
| AI Score |
68
|
58
|
| Price |
$36.11
|
$42.52
|
| P/E Ratio |
5.28×
|
-30.40×
|
| ROE |
14.6%
|
-6.1%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
49.9%
|
15.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.49×
|
0.72×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
2.3%
|
| RSI (14) |
65.8
|
84.3
|
| Beta |
0.611
|
0.619
|
| Expected Upside |
+16.5%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CNX versus HP.
CNX leads by 10 points.
CNX scores 68/100 (Buy) versus HP at 58/100 (Watch).
CNX Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 5.6 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is current ratio of 0.44 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 5.6 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.1x is a discount to asset value — Value
- ROE of 21.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Current ratio of 0.44 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
HP Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 30.1% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 0.8x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- ROE of only -5.2% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- RSI at 84 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical