CNX vs YPF
CNX Resources vs YPF Sociedad Anónima — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
YPF
YPF Sociedad Anónima
53
Watch
| Metric | CNX | YPF |
|---|
| AI Score |
68
|
53
|
| Price |
$36.11
|
$49.20
|
| P/E Ratio |
5.28×
|
-54.00×
|
| ROE |
14.6%
|
-7.6%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
49.9%
|
28.9%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.49×
|
0.95×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
65.8
|
44.0
|
| Beta |
0.611
|
-0.073
|
| Expected Upside |
+16.5%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CNX versus YPF.
CNX leads by 15 points.
CNX scores 68/100 (Buy) versus YPF at 53/100 (Watch).
CNX Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 5.6 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is current ratio of 0.44 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 5.6 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.1x is a discount to asset value — Value
- ROE of 21.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Current ratio of 0.44 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
YPF Committee View
33% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Risk Analyst remains cautious — current ratio of 0.87 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 1.4x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- ROE of only -7.0% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Current ratio of 0.87 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk