COST vs JBS
Costco vs Jbs N.V. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | COST | JBS |
| AI Score |
64
|
61
|
| Price |
$944.09
|
$13.03
|
| P/E Ratio |
47.43×
|
17.96×
|
| ROE |
27.8%
|
23.2%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
12.9%
|
11.9%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.25×
|
0.00×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.6%
|
7.7%
|
| RSI (14) |
55.2
|
41.6
|
| Beta |
0.86
|
0.1605
|
| Expected Upside |
+1.2%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for COST versus JBS.
COST leads by 3 points.
COST scores 64/100 (Buy) versus JBS at 61/100 (Buy).
COST Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.25) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is p/e of 47.6 is expensive by classic value standards. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 28.3% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 47.6 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 14.3x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- 2 consecutive earnings misses -- execution concerns — Growth
JBS Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 48.5% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 2.65) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 8.2 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 20.5% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 14.9% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 2.65 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.65) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk