CPAY vs SANM
Corpay vs Sanmina Corporation — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
SANM
Sanmina Corporation
65
Buy
| Metric | CPAY | SANM |
|---|
| AI Score |
71
|
65
|
| Price |
$393.20
|
$202.71
|
| P/E Ratio |
23.60×
|
35.57×
|
| ROE |
27.5%
|
10.4%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
73.3%
|
9.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
2.35×
|
0.95×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
61.8
|
52.5
|
| Beta |
0.881
|
1.561
|
| Expected Upside |
+1.9%
|
+42.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CPAY versus SANM.
CPAY leads by 6 points.
CPAY scores 71/100 (Buy) versus SANM at 65/100 (Buy).
CPAY Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Risk/reward is unfavorable: 14.7% downside vs 1.9% upside.
SANM Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is news sentiment is positive (+0.60 across 42 articles, 14d). The main limiting factor is p/e of 35.3 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 58.6% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 35.3 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Bollinger bandwidth of 29.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk