CR vs GNRC
Crane vs Generac — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | CR | GNRC |
|---|
| AI Score |
53
|
52
|
| Price |
$205.91
|
$202.03
|
| P/E Ratio |
35.64×
|
46.16×
|
| ROE |
17.8%
|
6.1%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
41.7%
|
39.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.51×
|
0.53×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.5%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
28.3
|
35.7
|
| Beta |
1.094
|
1.925
|
| Expected Upside |
+2.8%
|
+15.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CR versus GNRC.
CR leads by 1 points.
CR scores 53/100 (Watch) versus GNRC at 52/100 (Watch).
CR Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case. Technical Analyst remains cautious — rsi at 28 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 16.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 37.7 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 5.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- EPS declining -4.7% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
GNRC Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 17.9% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 50.8 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- EPS declining -25.6% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- Bollinger bandwidth of 17.9% signals elevated volatility — Risk