CRGY vs FTI
Crescent Energy Company vs TechnipFMC — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
CRGY
Crescent Energy Company
61
Buy
VS
| Metric | CRGY | FTI |
|---|
| AI Score |
61
|
68
|
| Price |
$12.41
|
$75.33
|
| P/E Ratio |
84.89×
|
25.71×
|
| ROE |
2.6%
|
28.7%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
75.3%
|
23.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
1.00×
|
0.38×
|
| Dividend Yield |
3.9%
|
0.3%
|
| RSI (14) |
76.4
|
63.5
|
| Beta |
0.892
|
0.718
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+4.8%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CRGY versus FTI.
FTI leads by 7 points.
FTI scores 68/100 (Buy) versus CRGY at 61/100 (Buy).
CRGY Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is split. Analysts see this stock differently enough that the current rating reflects genuine uncertainty, not a weak signal.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 0.5x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 3.9% pays you to wait — Value
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 73.7 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- ROE of only 1.1% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- RSI at 76 is in overbought territory — Technical
FTI Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.16) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is price-to-book of 5.4x prices in significant intangible value. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 35.3% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 35.9% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 5.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical