Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.

CRH vs ERO

CRH plc vs Ero Copper Corp. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
CRH
CRH plc
68
Buy
VS
ERO
Ero Copper Corp.
70
Buy
MetricCRHERO
AI Score 68 70
Price $101.27 $36.28
P/E Ratio 15.80× 12.16×
ROE 15.5% 28.7%
Revenue Growth YoY
Gross Margin 35.8% 42.9%
Debt / Equity 0.82× 0.47×
Dividend Yield 1.5% 0.0%
RSI (14) 53.0 87.6
Beta 1.189 1.586
Expected Upside +3.5%

AI Committee View

Current Innellis committee reasoning for CRH versus ERO.
ERO leads by 2 points.

ERO scores 70/100 (Buy) versus CRH at 68/100 (Buy).

CRH Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts

The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is price structure making lower highs and lower lows. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.

Bull Case
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
  • MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
  • VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
Bear Case
  • Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
  • Price structure (HH_HL) contradicts the downtrend -- mixed signals — Technical
ERO Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts

The primary driver is revenue growing 88.7% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. The main limiting factor is rsi at 88 is in overbought territory. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.

Bull Case
  • P/E of 12.2 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
  • ROE of 31.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
  • Revenue growing 88.7% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
Bear Case
  • RSI at 88 is in overbought territory — Technical
  • Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical
  • Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
Want the full breakdown?
Committee votes, technicals, and trade plans for both companies.
CRH Full Analysis ERO Full Analysis