CXW vs JLL
CoreCivic, Inc. vs Jones Lang LaSalle — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
69
Buy
VS
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle
66
Buy
| Metric | CXW | JLL |
|---|
| AI Score |
69
|
66
|
| Price |
$33.91
|
$363.17
|
| P/E Ratio |
27.58×
|
17.07×
|
| ROE |
8.3%
|
10.6%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
19.8%
|
89.6%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.94×
|
0.34×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
81.8
|
56.0
|
| Beta |
0.575
|
1.24
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+0.5%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CXW versus JLL.
CXW leads by 3 points.
CXW scores 69/100 (Buy) versus JLL at 66/100 (Buy).
CXW Committee View
100% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 1.4x is a discount to asset value — Value
- EPS growing 62.9% YoY — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 25.5 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- RSI at 82 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
JLL Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 22.0% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 22.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk