ENS vs GNRC
EnerSys vs Generac — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | ENS | GNRC |
|---|
| AI Score |
73
|
68
|
| Price |
$186.01
|
$206.12
|
| P/E Ratio |
24.45×
|
48.12×
|
| ROE |
15.4%
|
6.1%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
29.3%
|
39.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.62×
|
0.52×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.5%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
50.3
|
52.0
|
| Beta |
1.225
|
1.925
|
| Expected Upside |
+0.9%
|
+10.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ENS versus GNRC.
ENS leads by 5 points.
ENS scores 73/100 (Buy) versus GNRC at 68/100 (Buy).
ENS Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Most analysts agree, and no major concerns are blocking a stronger rating.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Risk/reward is unfavorable: 21.2% downside vs 0.9% upside.
GNRC Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is bollinger bandwidth of 20.8% signals elevated volatility. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 20.8% signals elevated volatility — Risk