EXPD vs FLR
Expeditors International vs Fluor — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
EXPD
Expeditors International
64
Buy
VS
| Metric | EXPD | FLR |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
62
|
| Price |
$189.04
|
$51.27
|
| P/E Ratio |
27.44×
|
-4.25×
|
| ROE |
34.5%
|
-1.6%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
23.9%
|
-0.8%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.27×
|
0.40×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.8%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
72.4
|
43.9
|
| Beta |
1.045
|
1.257
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+0.6%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for EXPD versus FLR.
EXPD leads by 2 points.
EXPD scores 64/100 (Buy) versus FLR at 62/100 (Buy).
EXPD Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is news sentiment is positive (+0.40 across 23 articles, 14d). The main limiting factor is p/e of 26.2 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 40.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 26.2 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 8.5x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 16.2% signals elevated volatility — Risk
FLR Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 17.6% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 17.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk