EXPD vs TRI
Expeditors International vs Thomson Reuters — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
EXPD
Expeditors International
64
Buy
VS
TRI
Thomson Reuters
56
Watch
| Metric | EXPD | TRI |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
56
|
| Price |
$189.04
|
$104.36
|
| P/E Ratio |
27.26×
|
29.04×
|
| ROE |
34.5%
|
12.6%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
23.9%
|
66.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.27×
|
0.29×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.8%
|
3.7%
|
| RSI (14) |
69.4
|
64.5
|
| Beta |
1.045
|
0.171
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+5.9%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for EXPD versus TRI.
EXPD leads by 8 points.
EXPD scores 64/100 (Buy) versus TRI at 56/100 (Watch).
EXPD Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is news sentiment is positive (+0.40 across 23 articles, 14d). The main limiting factor is p/e of 26.2 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 40.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 26.2 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 8.5x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 16.2% signals elevated volatility — Risk
TRI Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The committee sees neither a compelling opportunity nor a clear risk at this stage. Conditions remain neutral — patience is warranted.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical