FHN vs RF
First Horizon vs Regions Financial Corporation — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
58
Buy
| Metric | FHN | RF |
|---|
| AI Score |
71
|
58
|
| Price |
$25.47
|
$31.43
|
| P/E Ratio |
12.07×
|
12.67×
|
| ROE |
11.1%
|
11.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
75.4%
|
76.8%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.47×
|
0.40×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.5%
|
3.4%
|
| RSI (14) |
43.4
|
54.6
|
| Beta |
0.613
|
1.012
|
| Expected Upside |
+3.3%
|
+0.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FHN versus RF.
FHN leads by 13 points.
FHN scores 71/100 (Buy) versus RF at 58/100 (Buy).
FHN Committee View
100% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is revenue growing 64.2% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. The main limiting factor is 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 11.5 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.3x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 2.7% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
RF Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is market regime is bullish (bull market -- normal position sizing). The main limiting factor is growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
- Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical