Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
RF · NYSE · STOCK

Regions Financial (RF) Stock Analysis

Financial Services Updated September 22, 2026
$27.91
52W $22.70 – $32.47
66/100
$24.36B
11.5
1.00
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
66/100
Conviction: Contested · 67% agreement · 6 analysts
+0.6%
-8.3%
0.08:1
Contested
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.

Is RF Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates Regions Financial Corporation (RF) Buy with a composite score of 66/100 , based on 6 analysts with 67% agreement. Last updated September 22, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +9.20 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -10.80 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Risk Analyst sees a compelling case — low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.26) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. Technical Analyst remains cautious — rsi at 23 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • P/E of 10.9 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
  • Price-to-book of 1.2x is a discount to asset value — Value
  • Dividend yield of 6.0% pays you to wait — Value
  • Revenue growing 45.4% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
  • Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.26) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
  • VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
Bear Case
  • Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
  • RSI at 23 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup) — Technical
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of September 22, 2026
Overall Committee Score
66/100
Agreement
67%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 32%
of 211 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst bullish
77 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ P/E of 10.9 is inexpensive for the broad market
Growth Analyst bullish
60 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 45.4% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst bearish
38 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is deteriorating -- trend and/or momentum are working against this name
− RSI at 23 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup)
Risk Analyst bullish
80 / 100 · Low confidence
Risk profile is manageable -- leverage, volatility, and event exposure all look contained
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.26) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
Macro Analyst bullish
80 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking
News Analyst neutral
60 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager neutral
55 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 63.3 to 65.8.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: score 65->80 (+15); +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: score 45->55 (+10); +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Technical Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-22 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
22.6
Oversold
MACD Histogram
-0.167
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$26.16
Resistance
$28.72
Bollinger %B
0.08
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$29.13 Below
EMA 21
$29.73 Below
EMA 50
$30.07 Below
EMA 200
$28.69 Below

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
100
Growth
52
Profitability
68
Financial Health
50
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 11.5×
P/B Ratio 1.29×
PEG Ratio 0.75
Dividend Yield 3.84%
52W High $32.47
52W Low $22.70
Quality & Growth
ROE 1132.2%
ROA 135.1%
Gross Margin 7685.0%
Operating Margin 2976.6%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 0.40
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 11.5 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.3x; PEG ratio of 0.8 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 11.3%; Return on assets of 1.4%; Net margin of 23.3%; Gross margin of 76.8%; Current ratio of 0.33 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.40; Free cash flow per share is positive (2.07); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 0.9%; EPS growth decelerating (+6.9% -> +3.2% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 8.5%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full RF Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime