FTI vs MPC
TechnipFMC vs Marathon Petroleum — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
60
Buy
| Metric | FTI | MPC |
|---|
| AI Score |
63
|
60
|
| Price |
$75.19
|
$354.86
|
| P/E Ratio |
25.89×
|
12.48×
|
| ROE |
28.7%
|
23.4%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
23.0%
|
11.6%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.38×
|
1.80×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.3%
|
1.1%
|
| RSI (14) |
50.5
|
73.2
|
| Beta |
0.74
|
0.508
|
| Expected Upside |
+2.3%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FTI versus MPC.
FTI leads by 3 points.
FTI scores 63/100 (Buy) versus MPC at 60/100 (Buy).
FTI Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is eps growing 35.9% yoy. The main limiting factor is p/e of 25.5 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 35.3% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 35.9% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 25.5 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 5.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 20.1% signals elevated volatility — Risk
MPC Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — eps growing 330.2% yoy. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 1.90) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 11.7 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 48.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 330.2% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 1.90 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- RSI at 73 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Weekly RSI at 80 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical