FTI vs SM
TechnipFMC vs SM Energy Company — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
SM
SM Energy Company
59
Watch
| Metric | FTI | SM |
|---|
| AI Score |
68
|
59
|
| Price |
$75.33
|
$32.49
|
| P/E Ratio |
25.71×
|
8.40×
|
| ROE |
28.7%
|
13.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
23.0%
|
61.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.38×
|
0.90×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.3%
|
2.6%
|
| RSI (14) |
63.5
|
62.0
|
| Beta |
0.718
|
0.738
|
| Expected Upside |
+4.8%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FTI versus SM.
FTI leads by 9 points.
FTI scores 68/100 (Buy) versus SM at 59/100 (Watch).
FTI Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.16) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is price-to-book of 5.4x prices in significant intangible value. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 35.3% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 35.9% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 5.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
SM Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Value Analyst sees a compelling case — p/e of 7.4 is inexpensive for the broad market. Risk Analyst remains cautious — current ratio of 0.69 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 7.4 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 0.4x is a discount to asset value — Value
- ROE of 16.5% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
Bear Case
- EPS declining -28.4% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical