FTV vs VIAV
Fortive vs Viavi Solutions — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
VIAV
Viavi Solutions
62
Buy
| Metric | FTV | VIAV |
|---|
| AI Score |
66
|
62
|
| Price |
$60.48
|
$36.95
|
| P/E Ratio |
35.15×
|
-302.96×
|
| ROE |
9.0%
|
-2.1%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
63.2%
|
57.7%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.58×
|
0.48×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.4%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
50.2
|
37.8
|
| Beta |
0.976
|
1.234
|
| Expected Upside |
+3.8%
|
+47.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FTV versus VIAV.
FTV leads by 4 points.
FTV scores 66/100 (Buy) versus VIAV at 62/100 (Buy).
FTV Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
VIAV Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 33.5% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 33.5% signals elevated volatility — Risk