IR vs QXO
Ingersoll Rand vs QXO, Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | IR | QXO |
|---|
| AI Score |
69
|
57
|
| Price |
$85.02
|
$15.54
|
| P/E Ratio |
34.70×
|
-17.09×
|
| ROE |
5.8%
|
-2.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
37.9%
|
16.2%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.47×
|
0.38×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.1%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
54.1
|
57.9
|
| Beta |
1.168
|
2.302
|
| Expected Upside |
+2.9%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for IR versus QXO.
IR leads by 12 points.
IR scores 69/100 (Buy) versus QXO at 57/100 (Buy).
IR Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. The main limiting factor is p/e of 35.1 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- EPS growing 91.1% YoY — Growth
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 35.1 is moderate-to-rich — Value
QXO Committee View
50% agreement
4 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 25.4% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 25.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk