JKHY vs ONTO
Jack Henry & Associates vs Onto Innovation — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates
66
Buy
VS
ONTO
Onto Innovation
64
Buy
| Metric | JKHY | ONTO |
|---|
| AI Score |
66
|
64
|
| Price |
$154.92
|
$291.66
|
| P/E Ratio |
21.78×
|
114.61×
|
| ROE |
21.4%
|
6.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
44.1%
|
50.4%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.04×
|
0.77×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.5%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
56.2
|
63.4
|
| Beta |
0.553
|
1.587
|
| Expected Upside |
+16.5%
|
+2.5%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for JKHY versus ONTO.
JKHY leads by 2 points.
JKHY scores 66/100 (Buy) versus ONTO at 64/100 (Buy).
JKHY Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is price-to-book of 6.2x prices in significant intangible value. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 24.0% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 6.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
ONTO Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 35.3% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 35.3% signals elevated volatility — Risk