KGC vs NEM
Kinross Gold Corporation vs Newmont Corporation — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
63
Buy
VS
NEM
Newmont Corporation
63
Buy
| Metric | KGC | NEM |
|---|
| AI Score |
63
|
63
|
| Price |
$26.85
|
$114.18
|
| P/E Ratio |
10.50×
|
14.82×
|
| ROE |
28.4%
|
20.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
53.6%
|
54.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.08×
|
0.15×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.5%
|
0.9%
|
| RSI (14) |
76.8
|
87.6
|
| Beta |
1.406
|
0.5
|
| Expected Upside |
+1.2%
|
+2.9%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for KGC versus NEM.
The committee scores are tied.
KGC and NEM both score 63/100.
KGC Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 10.3 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is rsi at 77 is in overbought territory. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 10.3 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 36.0% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 39.5% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- RSI at 77 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 28.5% signals elevated volatility — Risk
NEM Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is split. Analysts see this stock differently enough that the current rating reflects genuine uncertainty, not a weak signal.
Bull Case
- P/E of 14.0 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 25.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 25.2% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- RSI at 88 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical