LAD vs YUM
Lithia Motors vs Yum! Brands Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
LAD
Lithia Motors
55
Watch
VS
YUM
Yum! Brands Inc.
57
Watch
| Metric | LAD | YUM |
|---|
| AI Score |
55
|
57
|
| Price |
$371.97
|
$154.54
|
| P/E Ratio |
12.27×
|
19.51×
|
| ROE |
12.4%
|
-21.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
11.0%
|
45.8%
|
| Debt / Equity |
2.58×
|
-1.73×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.6%
|
1.9%
|
| RSI (14) |
52.1
|
66.1
|
| Beta |
1.241
|
0.553
|
| Expected Upside |
+4.2%
|
+4.4%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for LAD versus YUM.
YUM leads by 2 points.
YUM scores 57/100 (Watch) versus LAD at 55/100 (Watch).
LAD Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Value Analyst sees a compelling case — p/e of 11.6 is inexpensive for the broad market. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 2.24) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 11.6 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.2x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 2.24 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- EPS declining -10.6% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
YUM Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — eps growing 57.2% yoy. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 4.31) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 117.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 57.2% YoY — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 35.0x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 4.31 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 4.31) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk