LRCX vs ONTO
Lam Research vs Onto Innovation — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
ONTO
Onto Innovation
64
Buy
| Metric | LRCX | ONTO |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
64
|
| Price |
$306.23
|
$291.66
|
| P/E Ratio |
53.77×
|
114.61×
|
| ROE |
58.3%
|
6.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
50.5%
|
50.4%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.30×
|
0.77×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.3%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
53.1
|
63.4
|
| Beta |
1.865
|
1.587
|
| Expected Upside |
+40.8%
|
+2.5%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for LRCX versus ONTO.
The committee scores are tied.
LRCX and ONTO both score 64/100.
LRCX Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is split. Analysts see this stock differently enough that the current rating reflects genuine uncertainty, not a weak signal.
Bull Case
- ROE of 67.0% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 26.0% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 38.6% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 53.5 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 41.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 28.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk
ONTO Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 35.3% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 35.3% signals elevated volatility — Risk