MGA vs WHR
Magna International Inc. vs Whirlpool Corporation — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
MGA
Magna International Inc.
64
Buy
VS
WHR
Whirlpool Corporation
53
Watch
| Metric | MGA | WHR |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
53
|
| Price |
$73.04
|
$40.35
|
| P/E Ratio |
26.82×
|
13.68×
|
| ROE |
6.8%
|
11.6%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
11.8%
|
13.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.55×
|
2.05×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.7%
|
11.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
67.9
|
46.2
|
| Beta |
1.856
|
1.133
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+46.6%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for MGA versus WHR.
MGA leads by 11 points.
MGA scores 64/100 (Buy) versus WHR at 53/100 (Watch).
MGA Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is price-to-book of 1.2x is a discount to asset value. The main limiting factor is eps declining -35.4% yoy despite any revenue growth. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 1.2x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 3.4% pays you to wait — Value
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- EPS declining -35.4% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
- Weekly RSI at 77 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
WHR Committee View
40% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 18 articles, 14d). Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 23.4% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- News sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 18 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- 3 consecutive earnings misses -- execution concerns — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 23.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk