MT vs RPM
ArcelorMittal S.A. vs RPM International — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
MT
ArcelorMittal S.A.
67
Buy
VS
RPM
RPM International
66
Buy
| Metric | MT | RPM |
| AI Score |
67
|
66
|
| Price |
$73.82
|
$113.82
|
| P/E Ratio |
30.85×
|
21.93×
|
| ROE |
5.8%
|
20.0%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
9.6%
|
41.4%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.26×
|
0.87×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.0%
|
1.9%
|
| RSI (14) |
64.1
|
53.5
|
| Beta |
1.737
|
1.047
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+2.8%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for MT versus RPM.
MT leads by 1 points.
MT scores 67/100 (Buy) versus RPM at 66/100 (Buy).
MT Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. The main limiting factor is p/e of 30.4 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 0.6x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Revenue growing 80.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 30.4 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- ROE of only 3.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- EPS declining -27.0% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
RPM Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is split. Analysts see this stock differently enough that the current rating reflects genuine uncertainty, not a weak signal.
Bull Case
- ROE of 20.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 4.0x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- EPS declining -3.5% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- Bollinger bandwidth of 18.2% signals elevated volatility — Risk