PHM vs YETI
PulteGroup vs Yeti Holdings — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
YETI
Yeti Holdings
65
Buy
| Metric | PHM | YETI |
|---|
| AI Score |
65
|
65
|
| Price |
$132.98
|
$52.18
|
| P/E Ratio |
13.52×
|
26.10×
|
| ROE |
17.1%
|
25.4%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
24.5%
|
57.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.18×
|
0.34×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.8%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
58.7
|
60.6
|
| Beta |
1.186
|
1.728
|
| Expected Upside |
+5.3%
|
+3.5%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for PHM versus YETI.
The committee scores are tied.
PHM and YETI both score 65/100.
PHM Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Risk Analyst sees a compelling case — low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.17) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. Growth Analyst remains cautious — revenue declining -7.3% yoy -- this is not a growth story right now. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.1 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Revenue declining -7.3% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
- EPS declining -26.8% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
YETI Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.11) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is price-to-book of 5.5x prices in significant intangible value. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 22.5% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 5.5x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- EPS declining -4.9% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth