SN vs TOL
SharkNinja vs Toll Brothers — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | SN | TOL |
| AI Score |
62
|
63
|
| Price |
$185.59
|
$155.20
|
| P/E Ratio |
37.63×
|
11.64×
|
| ROE |
26.2%
|
16.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
48.7%
|
24.9%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.32×
|
0.34×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.7%
|
| RSI (14) |
83.3
|
58.6
|
| Beta |
1.179
|
1.333
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+3.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for SN versus TOL.
TOL leads by 1 points.
TOL scores 63/100 (Buy) versus SN at 62/100 (Buy).
SN Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 30.1% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- RSI at 83 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
- Weekly RSI at 86 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
TOL Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 11.3 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is eps declining -2.0% yoy despite any revenue growth. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 11.3 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 15.5% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- EPS declining -2.0% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth