TMUS vs ZD
T-Mobile US Inc. vs Ziff Davis, Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
TMUS
T-Mobile US Inc.
62
Buy
VS
ZD
Ziff Davis, Inc.
54
Watch
| Metric | TMUS | ZD |
|---|
| AI Score |
62
|
54
|
| Price |
$178.49
|
$53.57
|
| P/E Ratio |
18.64×
|
3.03×
|
| ROE |
18.6%
|
2.7%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
54.5%
|
77.1%
|
| Debt / Equity |
2.06×
|
0.39×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.2%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
48.6
|
52.5
|
| Beta |
0.327
|
1.018
|
| Expected Upside |
+26.1%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for TMUS versus ZD.
TMUS leads by 8 points.
TMUS scores 62/100 (Buy) versus ZD at 54/100 (Watch).
TMUS Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 16.9% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
Bear Case
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 16.9% signals elevated volatility — Risk
ZD Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Growth Analyst remains cautious — revenue declining -1.8% yoy -- this is not a growth story right now. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 0.8x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 43.8 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- ROE of only 2.5% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Revenue declining -1.8% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth