Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
IWM · NASDAQ · ETF

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Analysis

Financial Services Updated August 23, 2026
$299.95
52W $228.90 – $305.18
60/100
$82.50B
1.26
AI Committee Verdict
Insufficient Data
60/100
Conviction: Low Data · 67% agreement · 3 analysts
+0.9%
-7.4%
0.12:1
Low Data

Is IWM Bullish or Bearish?

Mixed. Innellis AI committee rates iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Insufficient Data with a composite score of 60/100 , based on 3 analysts with 67% agreement. Last updated August 23, 2026.

What Would Change This View

No threshold can be published for IWM. The committee has not produced a scored recommendation, so there is no line for it to cross. Innellis does not infer one.

Executive Summary

Supporting evidence favours the bullish case. Most analysts agree, and no major concerns are blocking a stronger rating.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
  • Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of August 23, 2026
Overall Committee Score
60/100
Agreement
67%
Analysts
3
Conviction
Low Data
Sector Rank
Top 49%
of 212 Financial Services peers
Technical Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst neutral
53 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager neutral
45 / 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 3069.37)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 61.2 to 59.8.

Analyst-level changes:
  • News Analyst: score 58->53 (-4).

Comparing 2026-08-22 to 2026-08-23 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
49.6
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.150
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$277.62
Resistance
$302.71
Bollinger %B
0.57
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$300.57 Below
EMA 21
$299.24 Above
EMA 50
$296.53 Above
EMA 200
$281.84 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
P/E Ratio
P/B Ratio
PEG Ratio
Dividend Yield
52W High $305.18
52W Low $228.90
Quality & Growth
ROE
ROA
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity
AI Fundamental Assessment
[reduced confidence: limited earnings history] Earnings-history trend unavailable; growth based on TTM year-over-year only.
Get the Full IWM Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime