Is IWM a buy or sell right now?

Innellis AI committee rates iShares Russell 2000 ETF Buy with a composite score of 63/100.

Do analysts agree on IWM?

4 AI analysts evaluated iShares Russell 2000 ETF, with 50 percent agreement on the overall direction.

What is the near-term upside for IWM?

Based on nearby resistance levels, iShares Russell 2000 ETF has a near-term technical upside of +3.0 percent. This is a support/resistance measure, not a price target.

IWM · NASDAQ · ETF

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Analysis

Financial Services Updated October 10, 2026

$279.11

52W $228.90 – $305.18

AI Score

63/100

Market Cap

$76.72B

P/E Ratio

—

Beta

1.14

Is IWM Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Buy with a composite score of 63/100 , based on 4 analysts with 50% agreement. Last updated October 10, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy: Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +12.29 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch: Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -7.71 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Risk Analyst sees a compelling case. Portfolio Manager remains cautious — sector concentration is already high (hhi 2796.97). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case

MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical

Bear Case

Insufficient data for bear case.

Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.

Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 10, 2026

Overall Committee Score

63/100

Agreement

50%

Analysts

Conviction

Contested

Sector Rank

Top 33%

of 212 Financial Services peers

Technical Analyst neutral

58 / 100 · High confidence

Mixed or range-bound price action

+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum

Risk Analyst bullish

70 / 100 · Low confidence

Risk profile is manageable -- leverage, volatility, and event exposure all look contained

Macro Analyst bullish

65 / 100 · Low confidence

Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor

News Analyst neutral

58 / 100 · Low confidence

News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now

Portfolio Manager bearish

30 / 100 · Moderate confidence

The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks

− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2796.97)

Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 63.2 to 62.7.

Comparing 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-10 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)

40.1

Neutral

MACD Histogram

0.131

Bullish Momentum

Trend Direction

Sideways

Weekly: Uptrend

Market Structure

Mixed

Support

$277.62

Resistance

$287.58

Bollinger %B

0.25

Inside Bands

Price vs Moving Averages

EMA 9

$279.91 Below

EMA 21

$282.90 Below

EMA 50

$287.77 Below

EMA 200

$283.20 Below

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation

P/E Ratio —

P/B Ratio —

PEG Ratio —

Dividend Yield —

52W High $305.18

52W Low $228.90

Quality & Growth

ROE —

ROA —

Gross Margin —

Operating Margin —

Revenue Growth YoY —

Debt / Equity —

AI Fundamental Assessment

[reduced confidence: limited earnings history] Earnings-history trend unavailable; growth based on TTM year-over-year only.

Get the Full IWM Analysis

Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A

Open in Terminal →