SLV · NASDAQ · ETF
iShares Silver Trust ETF (SLV) Analysis
$54.80
52W $41.70 – $109.83
50/100
$29.48B
-22.8
1.26
Is SLV Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates iShares Silver Trust ETF (SLV) Watch with a composite score of 50/100
, based on 4 analysts with 50% agreement.
Last updated October 10, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +9.66 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -10.34 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case. Portfolio Manager remains cautious — sector concentration is already high (hhi 2796.97). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
Insufficient data for bull case.
Bear Case
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 15.3% signals elevated volatility — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of October 10, 2026
Overall Committee Score
50/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
4
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 93%
of 212 Financial Services peers
Technical Analyst
neutral
42
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst
bearish
35
/ 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− Bollinger bandwidth of 15.3% signals elevated volatility
Macro Analyst
bullish
65
/ 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst
neutral
60
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager
bearish
30
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2796.97)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 50.3 to 50.3.
- New bearish signals: 1 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
Analyst-level changes:
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-10 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
43.4
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.289
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$49.61
Resistance
$64.27
Bollinger %B
0.29
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$54.99
Below
EMA 21
$56.24
Below
EMA 50
$57.15
Below
EMA 200
$60.95
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
100
Profitability
0
Financial Health
100
Cash Flow
15
Valuation
P/E Ratio
-22.8×
P/B Ratio
1.10×
PEG Ratio
0.18
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$109.83
52W Low
$41.70
Quality & Growth
ROE
5.6%
ROA
5.6%
Gross Margin
0.0%
Operating Margin
0.0%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.00
AI Fundamental Assessment
[reduced confidence: limited earnings history] P/E ratio of -22.8 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.1x; PEG ratio of 0.2 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.1%; Return on assets of 0.1%; Net margin of 0.0%; Gross margin of 0.0%; Current ratio of 2115.93 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.00; Free cash flow per share is negative (0.00); Earnings-history trend unavailable; growth based on TTM year-over-year only.
Get the Full SLV Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →