Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
TLT · NASDAQ · ETF

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) Analysis

Financial Services Updated October 10, 2026
$77.91
52W $76.43 – $92.19
53/100
$39.42B
—
2.40
AI Committee Verdict
Insufficient Data
53/100
Conviction: Low Data · 67% agreement · 3 analysts
+3.0%
-0.1%
43.14:1
Low Data

Is TLT Bullish or Bearish?

Mixed. Innellis AI committee rates iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) Insufficient Data with a composite score of 53/100 , based on 3 analysts with 67% agreement. Last updated October 10, 2026.

What Would Change This View

No threshold can be published for TLT. The committee has not produced a scored recommendation, so there is no line for it to cross. Innellis does not infer one.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case. Portfolio Manager remains cautious — sector concentration is already high (hhi 2796.97). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
  • Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
  • Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bearish picture — Technical
  • Weekly RSI at 23 -- oversold on the larger timeframe too — Technical
  • News sentiment is negative (-0.33 across 165 articles, 14d) — News
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 10, 2026
Overall Committee Score
53/100
Agreement
67%
Analysts
3
Conviction
Low Data
Sector Rank
Top 85%
of 212 Financial Services peers
Technical Analyst neutral
49 / 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst neutral
47 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
− News sentiment is negative (-0.33 across 165 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager bearish
30 / 100 · Moderate confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2796.97)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 54.9 to 53.5.

Analyst-level changes:
  • News Analyst: score 51->47 (-4); +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Technical Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-10 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
39.5
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.065
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Support
$77.85
Resistance
$80.26
Bollinger %B
0.31
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$77.96 Below
EMA 21
$79.06 Below
EMA 50
$80.77 Below
EMA 200
$83.92 Below

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
P/E Ratio —
P/B Ratio —
PEG Ratio —
Dividend Yield —
52W High $92.19
52W Low $76.43
Quality & Growth
ROE —
ROA —
Gross Margin —
Operating Margin —
Revenue Growth YoY —
Debt / Equity —
AI Fundamental Assessment
[reduced confidence: limited earnings history] Earnings-history trend unavailable; growth based on TTM year-over-year only.
Get the Full TLT Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime