ALV vs FTDR
Autoliv vs Frontdoor, Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
ALV
Autoliv
76
Strong Buy
VS
FTDR
Frontdoor, Inc.
59
Watch
| Metric | ALV | FTDR |
|---|
| AI Score |
76
|
59
|
| Price |
$122.26
|
$83.57
|
| P/E Ratio |
14.34×
|
21.77×
|
| ROE |
28.6%
|
105.4%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
19.2%
|
52.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.88×
|
4.14×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.8%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
49.0
|
60.4
|
| Beta |
1.376
|
1.473
|
| Expected Upside |
+2.1%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ALV versus FTDR.
ALV leads by 17 points.
ALV scores 76/100 (Strong Buy) versus FTDR at 59/100 (Watch).
ALV Committee View
100% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Risk/reward is unfavorable: 6.4% downside vs 2.1% upside.
FTDR Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 4.85) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 98.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 17.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 4.85 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 4.85) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk