ALV vs LEN
Autoliv vs Lennar — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | ALV | LEN |
|---|
| AI Score |
62
|
61
|
| Price |
$125.30
|
$87.01
|
| P/E Ratio |
14.70×
|
13.62×
|
| ROE |
28.6%
|
9.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
19.2%
|
8.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.88×
|
0.29×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.8%
|
2.3%
|
| RSI (14) |
65.9
|
53.5
|
| Beta |
1.376
|
1.398
|
| Expected Upside |
+0.1%
|
+10.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ALV versus LEN.
ALV leads by 1 points.
ALV scores 62/100 (Buy) versus LEN at 61/100 (Buy).
ALV Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is eps declining -7.0% yoy despite any revenue growth. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 25.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 2.7% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- EPS declining -7.0% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
LEN Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Risk Analyst sees a compelling case — low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.27) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. Growth Analyst remains cautious — revenue declining -7.5% yoy -- this is not a growth story right now. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.0 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Revenue declining -7.5% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
- EPS declining -47.1% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- 3 consecutive earnings misses -- execution concerns — Growth