ALV vs M
Autoliv vs Macy's — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
ALV
Autoliv
76
Strong Buy
VS
| Metric | ALV | M |
|---|
| AI Score |
76
|
66
|
| Price |
$122.26
|
$24.52
|
| P/E Ratio |
14.34×
|
9.92×
|
| ROE |
28.6%
|
13.2%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
19.2%
|
36.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.88×
|
1.06×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.8%
|
3.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
49.0
|
49.7
|
| Beta |
1.376
|
1.45
|
| Expected Upside |
+2.1%
|
+0.9%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ALV versus M.
ALV leads by 10 points.
ALV scores 76/100 (Strong Buy) versus M at 66/100 (Buy).
ALV Committee View
100% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Risk/reward is unfavorable: 6.4% downside vs 2.1% upside.
M Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 10.0 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is revenue declining -0.3% yoy -- this is not a growth story right now. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 10.0 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.2x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 3.1% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- Revenue declining -0.3% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth