ALV vs MUSA
Autoliv vs Murphy USA — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | ALV | MUSA |
|---|
| AI Score |
62
|
59
|
| Price |
$123.29
|
$567.04
|
| P/E Ratio |
14.70×
|
17.19×
|
| ROE |
28.6%
|
75.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
19.2%
|
7.3%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.88×
|
3.50×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.8%
|
0.4%
|
| RSI (14) |
65.9
|
47.4
|
| Beta |
1.376
|
0.276
|
| Expected Upside |
+0.1%
|
+6.7%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ALV versus MUSA.
ALV leads by 3 points.
ALV scores 62/100 (Buy) versus MUSA at 59/100 (Buy).
ALV Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is eps declining -7.0% yoy despite any revenue growth. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 25.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 2.7% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- EPS declining -7.0% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
MUSA Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — eps growing 36.0% yoy. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 3.50) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 94.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 36.0% YoY — Growth
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 12.1x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 3.50 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 3.50) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk