ALV vs TSCO
Autoliv vs Tractor Supply — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
TSCO
Tractor Supply
53
Watch
| Metric | ALV | TSCO |
|---|
| AI Score |
63
|
53
|
| Price |
$123.99
|
$35.37
|
| P/E Ratio |
14.53×
|
18.43×
|
| ROE |
28.6%
|
42.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
19.2%
|
32.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.88×
|
2.49×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.8%
|
2.7%
|
| RSI (14) |
57.8
|
58.0
|
| Beta |
1.376
|
0.452
|
| Expected Upside |
+0.2%
|
+59.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ALV versus TSCO.
ALV leads by 10 points.
ALV scores 63/100 (Buy) versus TSCO at 53/100 (Watch).
ALV Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is eps declining -7.0% yoy despite any revenue growth. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 25.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 2.7% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- EPS declining -7.0% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
TSCO Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.25 across 12 articles, 14d). Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 22.6% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 39.3% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 10.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- EPS declining -5.8% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings misses -- execution concerns — Growth