CCK vs SLGN
Crown Holdings vs Silgan Holdings — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
CCK
Crown Holdings
59
Buy
VS
SLGN
Silgan Holdings
52
Watch
| Metric | CCK | SLGN |
|---|
| AI Score |
59
|
52
|
| Price |
$119.96
|
$42.41
|
| P/E Ratio |
17.12×
|
16.62×
|
| ROE |
24.5%
|
12.7%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
17.5%
|
17.1%
|
| Debt / Equity |
2.19×
|
2.03×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.1%
|
1.9%
|
| RSI (14) |
57.1
|
55.0
|
| Beta |
0.578
|
0.676
|
| Expected Upside |
+9.1%
|
+1.6%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CCK versus SLGN.
CCK leads by 7 points.
CCK scores 59/100 (Buy) versus SLGN at 52/100 (Watch).
CCK Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — eps growing 45.9% yoy. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 1.99) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 26.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 45.9% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 1.99 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.99) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
SLGN Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.25 across 4 articles, 14d). Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 1.91) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- News sentiment is positive (+0.25 across 4 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 1.91 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- EPS declining -9.7% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical