CF vs IAG
CF Industries vs Iamgold Corporation — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
IAG
Iamgold Corporation
63
Buy
| Metric | CF | IAG |
|---|
| AI Score |
69
|
63
|
| Price |
$117.79
|
$18.16
|
| P/E Ratio |
8.71×
|
9.13×
|
| ROE |
30.1%
|
16.2%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
42.5%
|
49.9%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.63×
|
0.12×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.7%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
54.7
|
78.6
|
| Beta |
0.398
|
2.255
|
| Expected Upside |
+7.3%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CF versus IAG.
CF leads by 6 points.
CF scores 69/100 (Buy) versus IAG at 63/100 (Buy).
CF Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is eps growing 76.3% yoy. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 8.5 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 40.4% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 76.3% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical
IAG Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 92.3% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 37.6% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 10.6 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 0.9x is a discount to asset value — Value
- ROE of 25.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
Bear Case
- RSI at 79 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 37.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk