CMC vs MLM
Commercial Metals vs Martin Marietta Materials — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
CMC
Commercial Metals
62
Buy
VS
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials
62
Buy
| Metric | CMC | MLM |
|---|
| AI Score |
62
|
62
|
| Price |
$75.13
|
$548.59
|
| P/E Ratio |
14.04×
|
13.45×
|
| ROE |
2.0%
|
11.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
18.6%
|
28.2%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.75×
|
0.52×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.0%
|
0.6%
|
| RSI (14) |
70.8
|
47.0
|
| Beta |
1.532
|
1.101
|
| Expected Upside |
+6.0%
|
+2.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CMC versus MLM.
The committee scores are tied.
CMC and MLM both score 62/100.
CMC Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — eps growing 1594.8% yoy. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 18.3% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 14.0 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- EPS growing 1594.8% YoY — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- RSI at 71 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 18.3% signals elevated volatility — Risk
MLM Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 13.4 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is price structure making lower highs and lower lows. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.4 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 23.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 125.7% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Price structure (HH_HL) contradicts the downtrend -- mixed signals — Technical