CMI vs STRL
Cummins vs Sterling Infrastructure — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
68
Buy
| Metric | CMI | STRL |
|---|
| AI Score |
49
|
68
|
| Price |
$571.47
|
$497.02
|
| P/E Ratio |
29.09×
|
35.40×
|
| ROE |
23.0%
|
26.2%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
25.3%
|
23.6%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.65×
|
0.25×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.4%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
18.6
|
31.4
|
| Beta |
1.246
|
1.889
|
| Expected Upside |
+8.1%
|
+102.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CMI versus STRL.
STRL leads by 19 points.
STRL scores 68/100 (Buy) versus CMI at 49/100 (Watch).
CMI Committee View
40% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case. Growth Analyst remains cautious — eps declining -8.0% yoy despite any revenue growth. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 21.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 3.0% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- P/E of 32.3 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 5.7x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- EPS declining -8.0% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
STRL Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is bollinger bandwidth of 25.8% signals elevated volatility. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 25.8% signals elevated volatility — Risk