DECK vs MAT
Deckers Brands vs Mattel — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
DECK
Deckers Brands
65
Buy
VS
| Metric | DECK | MAT |
|---|
| AI Score |
65
|
65
|
| Price |
$97.46
|
$14.79
|
| P/E Ratio |
13.80×
|
10.96×
|
| ROE |
41.0%
|
17.8%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
57.8%
|
47.4%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.21×
|
1.34×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
38.8
|
54.5
|
| Beta |
1.167
|
0.741
|
| Expected Upside |
+16.6%
|
+5.2%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for DECK versus MAT.
The committee scores are tied.
DECK and MAT both score 65/100.
DECK Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is news sentiment is positive (+0.67 across 23 articles, 14d). The main limiting factor is price structure making lower highs and lower lows. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.1 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 41.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 5.7x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
MAT Committee View
50% agreement
4 analysts
The committee is split. Analysts see this stock differently enough that the current rating reflects genuine uncertainty, not a weak signal.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical