FER vs R
Ferrovial vs Ryder — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | FER | R |
| AI Score |
49
|
61
|
| Price |
$62.81
|
$248.97
|
| P/E Ratio |
62.51×
|
20.27×
|
| ROE |
15.0%
|
16.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
10.4%
|
18.9%
|
| Debt / Equity |
1.86×
|
2.94×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.1%
|
1.5%
|
| RSI (14) |
34.8
|
27.1
|
| Beta |
0.795
|
1.014
|
| Expected Upside |
+3.8%
|
+3.0%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FER versus R.
R leads by 12 points.
R scores 61/100 (Buy) versus FER at 49/100 (Watch).
FER Committee View
33% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.25 across 4 articles, 14d). Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 67.8 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- News sentiment is positive (+0.25 across 4 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- P/E of 67.8 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 6.8x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 2.00 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
R Committee View
50% agreement
4 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. Technical Analyst remains cautious — rsi at 27 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- RSI at 27 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup) — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical