GFI vs IAG
Gold Fields Limited vs Iamgold Corporation — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
67
Buy
VS
IAG
Iamgold Corporation
63
Buy
| Metric | GFI | IAG |
|---|
| AI Score |
67
|
63
|
| Price |
$40.28
|
$18.16
|
| P/E Ratio |
9.81×
|
9.13×
|
| ROE |
42.4%
|
16.2%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
59.0%
|
49.9%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.43×
|
0.12×
|
| Dividend Yield |
4.6%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
76.3
|
78.6
|
| Beta |
0.597
|
2.255
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for GFI versus IAG.
GFI leads by 4 points.
GFI scores 67/100 (Buy) versus IAG at 63/100 (Buy).
GFI Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is revenue growing 135.1% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. The main limiting factor is rsi at 76 is in overbought territory. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 10.3 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 49.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 3.8% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 4.9x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- RSI at 76 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 36.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk
IAG Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 92.3% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 37.6% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 10.6 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 0.9x is a discount to asset value — Value
- ROE of 25.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
Bear Case
- RSI at 79 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 37.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk