MKC vs STZ
McCormick & Company vs Constellation Brands — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
MKC
McCormick & Company
62
Buy
VS
STZ
Constellation Brands
63
Buy
| Metric | MKC | STZ |
|---|
| AI Score |
62
|
63
|
| Price |
$52.91
|
$135.75
|
| P/E Ratio |
8.80×
|
12.94×
|
| ROE |
13.8%
|
20.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
38.6%
|
52.6%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.71×
|
1.28×
|
| Dividend Yield |
3.6%
|
3.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
63.1
|
67.7
|
| Beta |
0.626
|
0.382
|
| Expected Upside |
+31.8%
|
+23.4%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for MKC versus STZ.
STZ leads by 1 points.
STZ scores 63/100 (Buy) versus MKC at 62/100 (Buy).
MKC Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 8.8 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is current ratio of 0.70 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 8.8 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 25.4% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 3.7% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- Current ratio of 0.70 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
STZ Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 12.7 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is price structure making lower highs and lower lows. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 12.7 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 23.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 3.1% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- Revenue declining -10.0% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bearish picture — Technical