PBF vs VLO
PBF Energy vs Valero Energy — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | PBF | VLO |
|---|
| AI Score |
63
|
70
|
| Price |
$61.69
|
$298.30
|
| P/E Ratio |
5.37×
|
12.37×
|
| ROE |
-3.0%
|
9.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
4.5%
|
11.3%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.39×
|
0.45×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.8%
|
1.6%
|
| RSI (14) |
45.1
|
41.9
|
| Beta |
0.1
|
0.545
|
| Expected Upside |
+1.5%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for PBF versus VLO.
VLO leads by 7 points.
VLO scores 70/100 (Buy) versus PBF at 63/100 (Buy).
PBF Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Value Analyst sees a compelling case — p/e of 5.4 is inexpensive for the broad market. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 25.1% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 5.4 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 0.6x is a discount to asset value — Value
- ROE of 24.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 25.1% signals elevated volatility — Risk
VLO Committee View
100% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is eps growing 896.0% yoy. The main limiting factor is 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 12.0 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 29.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 896.0% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical