Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
JEF · NYSE · STOCK

Jefferies (JEF) Stock Analysis

Financial Services Updated September 22, 2026
$47.40
52W $35.53 – $71.04
56/100
$9.73B
12.9
1.49
AI Committee Verdict
Watch
56/100
Conviction: Contested · 50% agreement · 6 analysts
+0.1%
-2.5%
0.03:1
Contested

Is JEF Bullish or Bearish?

Mixed. Innellis AI committee rates Jefferies (JEF) Watch with a composite score of 56/100 , based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement. Last updated September 22, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Buy
Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +4.43 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Reduce
Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -15.57 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Technical Analyst remains cautious — price structure making lower highs and lower lows. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • P/E of 12.3 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
  • Price-to-book of 1.1x is a discount to asset value — Value
  • Dividend yield of 3.4% pays you to wait — Value
  • EPS growing 31.0% YoY — Growth
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
  • VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
Bear Case
  • Debt-to-equity of 3.35 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
  • 2 consecutive earnings misses -- execution concerns — Growth
  • Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
  • RSI at 24 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup) — Technical
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
  • Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bearish picture — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of September 22, 2026
Overall Committee Score
56/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 86%
of 211 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ P/E of 12.3 is inexpensive for the broad market
− Debt-to-equity of 3.35 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case
Growth Analyst bullish
64 / 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ EPS growing 31.0% YoY
− 2 consecutive earnings misses -- execution concerns
Technical Analyst bearish
32 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is deteriorating -- trend and/or momentum are working against this name
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst bearish
33 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 3.35) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst bullish
80 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking
News Analyst neutral
60 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager neutral
55 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 53.4 to 55.6.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: score 65->80 (+15); +1 bullish signal(s).
  • News Analyst: stance bullish->neutral.
  • Portfolio Manager: score 45->55 (+10); +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-22 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
24.4
Oversold
MACD Histogram
-0.598
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Support
$46.62
Resistance
$47.87
Bollinger %B
0.12
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$49.57 Below
EMA 21
$51.39 Below
EMA 50
$52.81 Below
EMA 200
$53.56 Below

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
100
Growth
57
Profitability
45
Financial Health
0
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 12.9×
P/B Ratio 0.97×
PEG Ratio 0.37
Dividend Yield 3.34%
52W High $71.04
52W Low $35.53
Quality & Growth
ROE 671.9%
ROA 93.5%
Gross Margin 6791.6%
Operating Margin 748.8%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 3.48
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 12.9 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.0x; PEG ratio of 0.4 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 6.7%; Return on assets of 0.9%; Net margin of 7.4%; Gross margin of 67.9%; Current ratio of 0.78 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 3.48; Free cash flow per share is positive (8.26); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 12.6%; 2 consecutive earnings misses; EPS growth accelerating (-27.1% -> +45.7% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full JEF Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime